Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Styf results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 4,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,548 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,388 of 6,625 authors). This Jon Styf is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Jon Styf
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
64%Jon Styf (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,548
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos