John Deere agrees to 10-year right-to-repair settlement 42%

By Jon Styf0% The Center Square44%

7/11/2026, 1:27:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 666 faulty-reasoning hits from 494 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,734 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the article peer group.

“Farmers shouldn’t have to go to a dealership to have repairs made to their farm equipment,” Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said. 
“This settlement will mean that farmers have more options in many circumstances in which repairs are needed to their John Deere equipment.” 
The company is currently the only place that has the software repair tools to perform electronic repairs on the equipment, the lawsuit claimed, which forced farmers to rely on only authorized dealers to make repairs and giving the company and its dealers monopoly power. 
The settlement agreement means that Deere will provide the same resources to farmers and independent dealers under the same terms it provides the same to Deere authorized dealers. 
The same applies to any new resources created over the next 10 years. 
The settlement came in U.S. 
District Court in Illinois. 
Wisconsin lawmakers had proposed right to repair legislation similar to a Colorado law that went into effect on Jan. 
1, 2024. 
“I have long supported farmers’ right to repair their own equipment, including authoring legislation to end these predatory practices against Wisconsin’s family farmers,” Wisconsin state Sen. 
Brad Pfaff, D-Onalaska, said in a statement. 
“This settlement puts our nation’s farmers first, allowing them to save money by repairing their own equipment or choosing the mechanic they trust.” 
John Deere said that it agreed with the settlement and believes that it will help customers. 
“We’ve said from the beginning that our focus is on helping customers keep their machines running when and how they need them,” Denver Caldwell, John Deere vice president of aftermarket and customer support, said in a statement. 
“This agreement bolsters that commitment, and we’re confident it will make a real difference for the people who depend on our equipment every day. 
We share the Administration’s and the states’ desire to put farmers first while preserving Deere’s ability to support American agricultural productivity, equipment safety and innovation.” 
Originally published on thecentersquare.com , part of the BLOX Digital Content Exchange . 
Settlement (litigation) 
Agricultural Machinery 
Federal Trade Commission 
Keep it Clean. 
Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, 
racist or sexually-oriented language. 
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. 
Don't Threaten. 
Threats of harming another 
person will not be tolerated. 
Be Truthful. 
Don't knowingly lie about anyone 
Be Nice. 
No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism 
that is degrading to another person. 
Be Proactive. 
Use the 'Report' link on 
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. 
Share with Us. 
We'd love to hear eyewitness 
accounts, the history behind an article. 
Watch this discussion. 
Stop watching this discussion. 
Driver seriously injured in Babbitt rollover crash 
Mesabi Metallics rolls out Patriot Pellet 
Former Rock Ridge dean faces local criminal sexual conduct charges 
North American Iron project gains financing 
Eveleth working on replacing the Big Stick 
Success! 
An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup. 
Error! 
There was an error processing your request. 
Latest Special Section 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.7%Jon Styf: 2.3%Mesabi Tribune: 1.4%Confirmation Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Jon Styf: 0.1%Mesabi Tribune: 0.3%Availability Heuristic1.0%This article: 3.8%Jon Styf: 0.7%Mesabi Tribune: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Jon Styf: 1.8%Mesabi Tribune: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias7.5%This article: 9.5%Jon Styf: 9.5%Mesabi Tribune: 11.5%Framing Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.5%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%Jon Styf: 8.4%Mesabi Tribune: 7.8%Optimism Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%Jon Styf: 3.6%Mesabi Tribune: 3.5%Negativity Bias14.2%This article: 7.9%Jon Styf: 9.4%Mesabi Tribune: 5.2%Self-Serving Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 1.4%Mesabi Tribune: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Jon Styf: 1.7%Mesabi Tribune: 1.9%Halo Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.7%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 2.2%Mesabi Tribune: 1.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 2.4%Mesabi Tribune: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.9%Jon Styf: 5.2%Mesabi Tribune: 4.5%Hasty Generalization8.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.7%Jon Styf: 12.1%Mesabi Tribune: 10.1%Appeal to Emotion4.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.0%Jon Styf: 0.1%Mesabi Tribune: 0.3%Anecdotal1.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 2.1%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.1%Jon Styf: 0.5%Mesabi Tribune: 1.3%Middle Ground5.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.4%Jon Styf: 1.9%Mesabi Tribune: 4.6%Unattributed Quote18.4%This article: 4.5%Jon Styf: 0.8%Mesabi Tribune: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.5%This article: 5.3%Jon Styf: 2.2%Mesabi Tribune: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice5.3%This article: 15.8%Jon Styf: 3.8%Mesabi Tribune: 8.5%Indoctrination15.8%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%Mesabi Tribune: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Jon Styf: 4.2%Mesabi Tribune: 5.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

494 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers31%attributed speech339writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Kaul • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Pfaff • 26 words • 100.0% coverageBrad Pfaff • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Pfaff • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Deere • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDenver Caldwell • 37 words • 0.0% coverageDenver Caldwell • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brad Pfaff

88%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words36% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice+46.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brad Pfaff: 46.4%46.4%Unattributed Quote-26.8 ptsWriter: 26.8%Brad Pfaff: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-23.0 ptsWriter: 23.0%Brad Pfaff: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.