John Deere agrees to 10-year right-to-repair settlement ⁠33%

By Jon Styf⁠0% The Center Square⁠44%

7/11/2026, 8:42:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 565 faulty-reasoning hits from 458 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (14,752 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the article peer group.

(The Center Square) – Deere and Co. agreed to provide farmers and independent repair shops access to the same equipment repair resources and software capabilities as authorized retailers for the next 10 years in a settlement agreement to a lawsuit filed by Wisconsin and four other states. 
The lawsuit claimed the company unfairly prevented farmers and independent repair shops the ability to repair John Deere tractors and farm equipment. 
Wisconsin was joined by Illinois, Arizona, Minnesota and the Federal Trade Commission in the lawsuit and the FTC will oversee the settlement agreement . 
“Farmers shouldn’t have to go to a dealership to have repairs made to their farm equipment,” Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said. 
“This settlement will mean that farmers have more options in many circumstances in which repairs are needed to their John Deere equipment.” 
The company is currently the only place that has the software repair tools to perform electronic repairs on the equipment, the lawsuit claimed, which forced farmers to rely on only authorized dealers to make repairs and giving the company and its dealers monopoly power. 
The settlement agreement means that Deere will provide the same resources to farmers and independent dealers under the same terms it provides the same to Deere authorized dealers. 
The same applies to any new resources created over the next 10 years. 
The settlement came in U.S. 
District Court in Illinois. 
Wisconsin lawmakers had proposed right to repair legislation similar to a Colorado law that went into effect on Jan. 
1, 2024. 
“I have long supported farmers’ right to repair their own equipment, including authoring legislation to end these predatory practices against Wisconsin’s family farmers,” Wisconsin state Sen. 
Brad Pfaff, D-Onalaska, said in a statement. 
“This settlement puts our nation’s farmers first, allowing them to save money by repairing their own equipment or choosing the mechanic they trust.” 
John Deere said that it agreed with the settlement and believes that it will help customers. 
“We’ve said from the beginning that our focus is on helping customers keep their machines running when and how they need them,” Denver Caldwell, John Deere vice president of aftermarket and customer support, said in a statement. 
“This agreement bolsters that commitment, and we’re confident it will make a real difference for the people who depend on our equipment every day. 
We share the Administration’s and the states’ desire to put farmers first while preserving Deere’s ability to support American agricultural productivity, equipment safety and innovation.” 
Originally published on thecentersquare.com , part of the BLOX Digital Content Exchange . 
Settlement (litigation) 
Agricultural Machinery 
Federal Trade Commission 
Text Newspaper Customer Service at 270-228-2827! 
Mon.-Fri. 
8AM-4PM (EST); Sat. 
8AM-11AM (EST) 
Message and data rates may apply frequency may vary. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Jon Styf: 2.3%HomeTown Register: 2.5%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 2.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.1%HomeTown Register: 1.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.1%Jon Styf: 0.7%HomeTown Register: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Jon Styf: 1.8%HomeTown Register: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias8.1%This article: 5.2%Jon Styf: 9.5%HomeTown Register: 8.3%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 3.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.5%HomeTown Register: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Jon Styf: 8.4%HomeTown Register: 4.8%Optimism Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%Jon Styf: 3.6%HomeTown Register: 5.0%Negativity Bias15.3%This article: 17.0%Jon Styf: 9.4%HomeTown Register: 6.3%Self-Serving Bias17.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 1.4%HomeTown Register: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 1.7%HomeTown Register: 3.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.7%HomeTown Register: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 2.2%HomeTown Register: 5.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.6%Jon Styf: 2.4%HomeTown Register: 2.6%False Dilemma9.6%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.9%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 5.2%HomeTown Register: 1.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.5%Jon Styf: 12.1%HomeTown Register: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion15.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.1%HomeTown Register: 1.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.6%Jon Styf: 2.1%HomeTown Register: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.6%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.5%HomeTown Register: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%Jon Styf: 1.9%HomeTown Register: 0.2%Unattributed Quote3.5%This article: 4.8%Jon Styf: 0.8%HomeTown Register: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection4.8%This article: 5.9%Jon Styf: 2.2%HomeTown Register: 0.7%Biased Writer Voice5.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 3.8%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Styf: 0.0%HomeTown Register: 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Jon Styf: 4.2%HomeTown Register: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.3%

458 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers44%attributed speech256writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Kaul • 22 words • 100.0% coverageJosh Kaul • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Pfaff • 26 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Pfaff • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Pfaff • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Deere • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDenver Caldwell • 37 words • 0.0% coverageDenver Caldwell • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDenver Caldwell • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

John Deere

100%flagged-word coverage
16 attributed words7.9% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Deere: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.5 ptsWriter: 10.5%John Deere: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%John Deere: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.