Speaker summary
51% 8 analyzed articles/videos 627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Gates results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 118 hits . Analysis detected 1,201.106 faulty-reasoning hits from 627 analyzed words across 8 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,082 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Gates is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Bill Gates
Speaker details
Total words: 627
Content count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.5% percentile 6.4% BS Score8 analyzed videos627 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst