Speaker summary
56% 126 analyzed articles/videos 6,640.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Netanyahu results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,082.534 hits . Analysis detected 9,452.952 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,640.333 analyzed words across 126 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,183 of 28,309 speakers). This Benjamin Netanyahu is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Benjamin Netanyahu
Speaker details
Total words: 6,640.333
Content count: 126
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score126 analyzed videos6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst