Fox News⁠98%

Trump RESPONDS to Mamdani's push to arrest Netanyahu #shorts #us #news #nyc #Mamdani #Trump ⁠99%

7/21/2026, 5:00:33 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Burden of Proof, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 63.4% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 616 faulty-reasoning hits from 153 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (222 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the video peer group.

The commander in chief posting in part 
quote, Benjamin Netanyahu will not be arrested in any way, shape or form 
[music] while in the United States of America. That response comes after 
Mondani doubled down on his promise to arrest the prime minister over his alleged crimes against humanity. 
>> When it comes to Benjamin Netanyahu, we're speaking about someone who's the subject of an international criminal court arrest warrant. 
My point is that if someone is charged with a warrant for by the international criminal court for these kinds of crimes, that's something I believe that should be honored and 
I've also said that we will follow our local laws. 
>> The International Criminal Court issued a warrant [music] for Netanyahu in late 2024 accusing him of war crimes in Gaza following the October 7th attacks in Israel. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias4.6%This article: 29.4%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic29.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias8.5%This article: 29.4%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect29.4%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion6.5%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias20.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 37.9%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias37.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias7.8%This article: 9.2%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 63.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority63.4%This article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma8.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 20.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning20.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 7.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring7.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.1%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion11.1%This article: 15.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question15.0%This article: 26.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)26.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 34.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof34.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 24.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)24.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.2%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote9.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
0.0%

153 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers38%attributed speech95writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageBenjamin Netanyahu ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 12 words ‱ 0.0% coverageMondani ‱ 17 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 21 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 31 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageInternational Criminal Court ‱ 28 words ‱ 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Benjamin Netanyahu

100%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words22% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-14.7 ptsWriter: 14.7%Benjamin Netanyahu: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.