Author summary
88%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Henry Austin results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 1,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,533 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,143 of 6,316 authors). This Henry Austin is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Henry Austin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%Henry Austin (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,533
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.9% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 26.9%26.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 26.9%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos