Speaker summary
44% 20 analyzed articles/videos 709.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Beshear results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 105.653 hits . Analysis detected 1,030.603 faulty-reasoning hits from 709.667 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,830 of 28,364 speakers). This Andy Beshear is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Andy Beshear
Speaker details
Total words: 709.667
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score20 analyzed videos709.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst