Speaker summary
⁠48%6 analyzed articles/videos417.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Mitchell results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 901.6 faulty-reasoning hits from 417.333 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (24,698 of 27,797 speakers). This Andrea Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Andrea Mitchell
Speaker details
Total words: 417.333
Content count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
9.9% BS Score6 analyzed videos417.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos