Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Thomas S. Mulligan results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hindsight Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,015 hits . Analysis detected 7,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Thomas S. Mulligan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Thomas S. Mulligan
Author details
Total words: 10,372
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst