Speaker summary
⁠58%4 analyzed articles/videos392.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Navarro results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 1,072.425 faulty-reasoning hits from 392.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,053 of 28,364 speakers). This Ana Navarro is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Ana Navarro
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 392.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.7% percentile
10.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos392.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 5.3%Red Herring: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos