Ana Navarro scolds Joy Behar after The View host revealed all her preferred Democrat presidential candidates are white men 37%

By Alex Hammer52%

7/10/2026, 8:05:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 968 faulty-reasoning hits from 736 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,989 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the article peer group.

By ALEX HAMMER, US MEDIA CORRESPONDENT 
Updated: 16:24 EDT, 10 July 2026 
Things got testy between Ana Navarro and Joy Behar on Friday's View during a segment about the panelists' preferred picks for the 2028 Democratic nomination. 
Alyssa Farah Griffin kicked things off by floating Kamala Harris as a favorite, leaving Behar unconvinced. 
'I loved her. 
She was great. 
But she didn’t win one time, what makes you think she’s going to win again?' 
the host observed. 
Griffin said she found it 'hard to believe' that the Democratic Party 'would pass over [Harris] for a generic white man.' 
Behar then offered her list: Jon Ossoff, Josh Shapiro, and JB Pritzker, and Gavin Newsom - all of whom are white men. 
Sara Haines responded by suggesting Pete Buttigieg and Maryland Governor Wes Moore instead. 
'We all love Buttigieg, but are they going to vote for a gay guy?' 
Behar replied bluntly. 
Haines - a self-professed independent - said she refused ' to break the party down' by demographics. 
'You’re not in reality about the country,' said Behar, 83, before finding herself met with a lengthy reprimand from Navarro. 
Ana Navarro lectured Joy Behar about her reach after the 83-year-old named four white men when asked for her picks for a Democratic presidential candidate 
Behar maintained she was merely picking the candidates who boast the best chances of success 
'There's not going to be one great candidate. 
I think you're going to see in the Democratic nomination, I think you're going to see on the stage 10, 12, 15 great candidates and the people are going to get to vote,' Navarro, 54, maintained. 
'I think you are going to see a gay man. 
I think you are going to see a black woman. 
I think you are going to see-' 
Behar blurted out: 'But who is going to win, is the question.' 
'They're gonna duke it out,' Navarro answered. 
The statement left Behar still skeptical. 
'You guys, I don't know. 
Maybe I'm too old at this point for this conversation. 
But I've been watching this country for a long time, and you've got to be in reality. 
These past few years [Donald] Trump's been in office, he's practically destroying democracy,' she said. 
'This is an emergency we're in. 
We can't play around.' 
Behar's warning was promptly met with applause. 
Navarro, however, was not pleased. 
Navarro chided her in response. 
'I hate it when I hear you say that it's got to be, like, a white man, because I then feel it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. 
And I don't want that,' she said 
She told Behar: 'I hate it when I hear you say that it's got to be, like, a white man, because I then feel it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. 
And I don't want that.' 
Behar - a longtime comedienne - joked: 'I'm not that powerful, Ana.' 
A more-serious Navarro told the table: 'Millions of people watch us on a daily basis. 
'And you are a feminist. 
You have fought to break glass ceilings.' 
'She's also a realist,' Sunny Hostin chimed in, admitting that while she wished the country could look 'beyond identity' when it comes to the likelihood of securing election, that still wasn't the reality. 
Navarro still continued to contest. 
'I know, but what I’m saying is, I’m not going to tell little black children or little Latino children, or little girls that they can’t run and become president,' she argued. 
Behar, a lifetime Democrat, clapped back: 'I am not saying that. 
I am saying that we are in a burning building right now. 
That’s all I’m saying. 
'I’m talking about winning. 
What is this country going to do?' 
The conversation grew tense as Navarro continued her comments 
'You guys, I don't know. 
Maybe I'm too old at this point for this conversation. 
But I've been watching this country for a long time, and you've got to be in reality,' said Behar at a point 
The View's official X account went on to share a clip of the exchange. 
The segment began with a clip of New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez responding to a prediction from JD Vance that she would surface as the Democrat's frontrunner. 
'I hope he is - that's all I'll say,' Ocasio-Cortez, 36, said. 
The Daily Mail approached ABC News for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Alex Hammer: 2.9%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Alex Hammer: 1.4%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic1.0%This article: 9.2%Alex Hammer: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic9.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Alex Hammer: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 6.6%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Alex Hammer: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion4.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Alex Hammer: 1.4%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias7.6%This article: 5.2%Alex Hammer: 1.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias5.2%This article: 11.5%Alex Hammer: 11.4%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias11.5%This article: 2.0%Alex Hammer: 1.1%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias2.0%This article: 6.8%Alex Hammer: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error6.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 2.8%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Alex Hammer: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.9%This article: 1.1%Alex Hammer: 1.6%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Alex Hammer: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 2.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Alex Hammer: 3.3%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 7.7%Alex Hammer: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma7.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 7.5%Alex Hammer: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning7.5%This article: 1.9%Alex Hammer: 6.0%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization1.9%This article: 1.6%Alex Hammer: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring1.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.8%Alex Hammer: 6.2%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 2.7%Alex Hammer: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question2.7%This article: 2.0%Alex Hammer: 2.0%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.0%This article: 4.2%Alex Hammer: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque4.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 1.8%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.0%Alex Hammer: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Alex Hammer: 3.7%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.8%Alex Hammer: 6.0%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice8.8%This article: 4.2%Alex Hammer: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination4.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Hammer: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

736 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers77%attributed speech167writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 3 words • 100.0% coverageJoy Behar • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageAlyssa Farah Griffin • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSara Haines • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageSara Haines • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageJoy Behar • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 36 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 15 words • 100.0% coverageJoy Behar • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 29 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSunny Hostin • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAna Navarro • 31 words • 100.0% coverageJoy Behar • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJoy Behar • 22 words • 0.0% coverageThe View's official X account • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 12 words • 100.0% coverageThe Daily Mail • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sunny Hostin

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words5.8% of attributed speech50% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-29.9 ptsWriter: 29.9%Sunny Hostin: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Sunny Hostin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.