Speaker summary
65% 9 analyzed articles/videos 653.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Gertner results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring , Self-Serving Bias , and Straw Man , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 172.012 hits . Analysis detected 1,331.05 faulty-reasoning hits from 653.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,522 of 28,364 speakers). This Amy Gertner is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Amy Gertner
Speaker details
Total words: 653.667
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 9.4% BS Score9 analyzed videos653.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 29.8% 29.8% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 26.3% 26.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Straw Man: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Middle Ground: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Straw Man Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst