Speaker summary
47% 31 analyzed articles/videos 2,512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Coney Barrett results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Quote-first Misdirection , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 871.098 hits . Analysis detected 4,206.181 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,512 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,138 of 28,364 speakers). This Amy Coney Barrett is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Amy Coney Barrett
Speaker details
Total words: 2,512
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score31 analyzed videos2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.3% 29.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst