Publication summary
28%1 analyzed article/video989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iowa Public Radio results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 2,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (167 of 398 publications). This Iowa Public Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Iowa Public Radio
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%inlander.com1%
59%Iowa Public Radio (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 3,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 9.3%9.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Publication 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos