Speaker summary
69% 15 analyzed articles/videos 772.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Schiff results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Begging the Question , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 349.235 hits . Analysis detected 2,533.19 faulty-reasoning hits from 772.667 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (25,254 of 26,730 speakers). This Adam Schiff is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. Adam Schiff
Speaker details
Total words: 772.667
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.5% percentile 7.1% BS Score15 analyzed videos772.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 34.3% 34.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.6% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst