Speaker summary
⁠41%5 analyzed articles/videos391.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 250.28 faulty-reasoning hits from 391.5 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (26,809 of 27,843 speakers). This Adam is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Adam
Speaker ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.7% percentile
5.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos391.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos