Author summary
31% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeanne Phillips results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 736 hits . Analysis detected 5,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,414 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,762 of 6,628 authors). This Jeanne Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Jeanne Phillips
Author details
Total words: 7,414
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst