Dear Abby: My boyfriend just told me why he hasn’t gotten a vasectomy 30%

By Jeanne Phillips29%

7/23/2026, 8:00:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 757 faulty-reasoning hits from 572 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of 30% (14,905 of 21,164 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the article peer group.

DEAR ABBY: 
My boyfriend, “Adam,” and I have been together for four years. 
We are very much in love and share similar views on most things. 
We agree that a marriage license is just a piece of paper and our relationship is already a marriage, so we don’t need one. 
We have also discussed the idea of having children in the future, and we agreed we didn’t want any. 
I have never had the drive to be a mother, although I have been told I would make an excellent one. 
Even Adam has said it. 
But we both have been adamant that we don’t want children. 
We love our freedom way too much (or at least I do), not to mention the finances involved, and we want to travel a lot. 
Because I can no longer take birth control, I have been considering tying my tubes. 
Adam volunteered to get a vasectomy because he said he doesn’t want me to go in for surgery. 
Well, this week he confessed that he hasn’t gone through with it because he’s scared and he still might want a baby. 
Adam has flip-flopped back and forth over the last two years about having or not having a child, while I have stayed firm on not wanting any. 
Should I consider having a child if that’s what he wants? 
I love him. 
He’s the man I see myself growing old with, and I don’t want to break his heart. 
 PERPLEXED IN CALIFORNIA 
DEAR PERPLEXED: 
Parenthood is a joy that should be embarked upon because you sincerely want a child, not to please your boyfriend. 
The truth is that motherhood is a lifetime responsibility. 
It doesn’t end when the child turns 21. 
I implore you not to make such an important decision to please anyone but yourself, because if something happened to Adam, you would have to raise that child alone. 
There are other options besides birth control medications you should discuss with your doctor. 
Unless you are absolutely certain you want to become a mother, you should utilize them religiously. 
As to a marriage license “just being a piece of paper,” let me point out that it is much more than that. 
It entitles a spouse to participate in medical decisions if a husband or wife becomes incapacitated, and it also guarantees rights of inheritance if, heaven forbid, something should happen to either of you. 
Yes, I know there is such a thing as common law marriage, but a marriage certificate is better  trust me on that. 
DEAR ABBY: We have a morbidly obese 30-year-old grandson (at least 300 pounds) coming for dinner along with family. 
We don’t have any chairs that will accommodate him. 
We are concerned that he will be embarrassed. 
Can you help us in handling this dilemma? 
 HOSTESS IN CALIFORNIA 
DEAR HOSTESS: I’ll try. 
Go online or start calling around to furniture rental companies or catering companies that may have chairs you can rent that will accommodate your grandson. 
If that isn’t an option, consider buying something sturdy, perhaps from a secondhand or thrift store, to have available for him during family gatherings. 
Dear Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, also known as Jeanne Phillips, and was founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. 
Contact Dear Abby at www.DearAbby.com or P.O. 
Box 69440, Los Angeles, CA 90069. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%Jeanne Phillips: 3.5%East Bay Times: 2.7%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Jeanne Phillips: 1.9%East Bay Times: 5.2%Availability Heuristic15.2%This article: 5.6%Jeanne Phillips: 2.2%East Bay Times: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.0%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 1.1%East Bay Times: 4.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Jeanne Phillips: 3.2%East Bay Times: 1.7%Loss Aversion6.3%This article: 4.2%Jeanne Phillips: 1.7%East Bay Times: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 1.6%East Bay Times: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Jeanne Phillips: 3.1%East Bay Times: 0.9%Pessimism Bias3.8%This article: 10.7%Jeanne Phillips: 5.3%East Bay Times: 6.0%Negativity Bias10.7%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 4.0%East Bay Times: 9.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.9%East Bay Times: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Jeanne Phillips: 1.1%East Bay Times: 2.9%Halo Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 1.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Jeanne Phillips: 1.4%East Bay Times: 0.5%Recency Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.8%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.0%Straw Man3.8%This article: 4.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.1%East Bay Times: 1.3%Appeal to Authority4.0%This article: 4.7%Jeanne Phillips: 1.8%East Bay Times: 1.8%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 3.3%East Bay Times: 2.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.2%Jeanne Phillips: 4.8%East Bay Times: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion19.2%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.2%East Bay Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Jeanne Phillips: 1.2%East Bay Times: 0.0%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.3%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 3.7%Anecdotal3.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.0%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.7%Jeanne Phillips: 1.7%East Bay Times: 0.2%Biased Writer Voice7.7%This article: 6.3%Jeanne Phillips: 9.5%East Bay Times: 2.9%Indoctrination6.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jeanne Phillips: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.9%

572 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.0%attributed speech549writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAdam • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAdam • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Adam

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words100% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Adam: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%Adam: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Adam: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%Adam: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.