Topic summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dear Abby results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 5,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,948 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,980 of 16,562 topics). This Dear Abby is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Dear Abby
Topic details
Total words: 6,948
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst