Topic summary
ā 46%1 analyzed article/video572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vasectomy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 2,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 40% (9,734 of 15,988 topics). This Vasectomy is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Vasectomy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 40%Vasectomy (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos