Publication summary
93% 24 analyzed articles/videos 17,915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wonkette results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 23,673 hits . Analysis detected 105,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 77,169 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (130 of 556 publications). This Wonkette is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 77,169
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score24 analyzed articles77.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 30.7% 30.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Publication 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 30.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 10.3%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst