Wonkette⁠93%

Same as it ever was! Wonkette One-A-Day for 8/4/26! ⁠69%

By Rebecca Schoenkopf⁠86%

8/4/2026, 1:23:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 84.5% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 422 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,601 of 27,485 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the article peer group.

Hi all, here were today’s what the actual fucks! 
It was Evan in the music room with the morning roundup. 
This about the Reflecting Pool — that Trump is probably gonna fire Judge Boxwine for admitting that the Department of Interior vandalized the Reflecting Pool its own bad self — is funny. 
Tee hee. 
For what passes for funny these days anyway. 
I mean not that Gary isn’t funny, just our bar for being vaguely amused by their stupid antics and comeuppances is soooo lowwwww. 
This isn’t funny at all, it’s atrocious. 
Evan on how this “family matter” is affecting the rest of the Ohio Republican family (badly). 
Same as it ever was! 
Same as it ever was, samer, everer! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 5.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 24.8%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.5%Wonkette: 2.1%Availability Heuristic24.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 4.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.7%Wonkette: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 13.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.5%Status Quo Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.0%Wonkette: 0.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.4%Wonkette: 1.5%Pessimism Bias6.2%This article: 84.5%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 18.0%Wonkette: 16.0%Negativity Bias84.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.1%Wonkette: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.1%Wonkette: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 12.4%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias12.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.0%Wonkette: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.3%Wonkette: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.5%Wonkette: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.7%Wonkette: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 6.2%Wonkette: 11.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 24.8%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.8%Wonkette: 1.3%Slippery Slope24.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.1%Wonkette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 7.5%Wonkette: 8.0%Hasty Generalization24.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.5%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 5.5%Wonkette: 7.2%Appeal to Emotion8.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.5%Wonkette: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 24.8%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.8%Wonkette: 2.1%Anecdotal24.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 76.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 31.8%Wonkette: 30.7%Biased Writer Voice76.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.2%Wonkette: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 24.8%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 8.9%Wonkette: 10.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias24.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.5%Wonkette: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 11.3%Wonkette: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.1%

129 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers24%attributed speech98writer words
Selected voice

Evan

59%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words87% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Evan: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-32.7 ptsWriter: 32.7%Evan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.