Wonkette⁠93%

Hey Pittsburgh And Cleveland: Catch! ⁠65%

By Rebecca Schoenkopf⁠86%

8/3/2026, 1:20:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 49% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 446 faulty-reasoning hits from 196 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (9,726 of 27,487 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the article peer group.

Hey dummies! 
Some light housekeeping of the Wonkmeet variety, as I finally got my shit together and got some times and addresses! 
(ZiggyWiggy got times and addresses for Cleveland; if you seize the means of Wonkmeet production, you never know what kind of riffraff — me — is going to show up.) 
Here is where you send riffraff money. 
I changed the time of the Pittsburgh Wonkmeet and Booze and Fun so Pittsburgh comes first SO YOU SEE THE IMPORTANT TIME CHANGE, because I changed the time. 
We shall be meeting at Warren Bar and Burrow, 245 7th St, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, where we shall buy you drinks and snax from Sunday, Aug. 9, from FOUR to SEVEN p.m. just as soon as we get some money from the pawn shop on the corner. 
What the heck is that song. 
Cleveland, you are hopping into Obama’s time machine and traveling BACK a day to Saturday, Aug. 8, 1-3 p.m., at Boss Dog Brewing Company, 2179 Lee Rd, Cleveland Heights, OH 44118! 
With the snax and the drinks and you’d be crazy not to come. 
We love you very much. 
OPEN THREAD! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 5.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.5%Wonkette: 2.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 4.0%Framing Effect15.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.7%Wonkette: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.0%Wonkette: 0.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.4%Wonkette: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 18.0%Wonkette: 16.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.1%Wonkette: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.1%Wonkette: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.0%Wonkette: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.3%Wonkette: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.5%Wonkette: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.7%Wonkette: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 6.2%Wonkette: 11.9%Ad Hominem1.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 15.3%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.8%Wonkette: 1.3%Slippery Slope15.3%This article: 14.3%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.1%Wonkette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning14.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 7.5%Wonkette: 8.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.6%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.4%Bandwagon6.6%This article: 27.6%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 5.5%Wonkette: 7.2%Appeal to Emotion27.6%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.5%Wonkette: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.3%Wonkette: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.3%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 2.8%Wonkette: 2.1%Anecdotal15.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.6%Wonkette: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 3.1%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.2%Personal Incredulity3.1%This article: 14.3%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.2%Special Pleading14.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.4%Wonkette: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 49.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 31.8%Wonkette: 30.7%Biased Writer Voice49.0%This article: 21.9%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 1.2%Wonkette: 2.2%Indoctrination21.9%This article: 15.8%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 8.9%Wonkette: 10.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 0.5%Wonkette: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 27.6%Rebecca Schoenkopf: 11.3%Wonkette: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…27.6%

196 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.