Keyword summary
59%3 analyzed articles/videos3,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleveland results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,841 hits. Analysis detected 5,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,298 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,289 of 37,536 keywords). This Cleveland is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Cleveland
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
12%Cleveland (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,298
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos