Sound of Ideas 66%

By Stephanie Haney85% Mike McIntyre85%

12/14/2022, 4:25:50 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 63.2% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 63 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.5% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,637 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the article peer group.

The "Sound of Ideas" is Ideastream Public Media's daily flagship public affairs program focusing on Northeast Ohio. 
Listen on WKSU. 
Watch live or on-demand on the Ohio Channel. 
Or subscribe on the podcast app of your choice. 
Call 866-578-0903 or email us with your comments or ideas for upcoming shows. 
Did you attend our recent Community Tour event? 
Please take a moment to fill out this survey and let us know your thoughts. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 1.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 3.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 3.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 1.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 9.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 2.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 2.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 5.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 19.7%Stephanie Haney: 19.1%Ideastream Public Media: 4.2%Indoctrination19.7%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Haney: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 63.2%Stephanie Haney: 45.4%Ideastream Public Media: 7.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…63.2%

76 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker22%attributed speech59writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageIdeastream Public Media • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
0%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words100% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -81.4 ptsWriter: 81.4%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-25.4 ptsWriter: 25.4%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.