Speaker summary
⁠36%6 analyzed articles/videos783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ideastream Public Media results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 176.963 hits. Analysis detected 695.136 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (28,063 of 28,364 speakers). This Ideastream Public Media is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Ideastream Public Media
Speaker details
Total words: 783
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score6 analyzed videos783 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos