What Did I Hear? | Ideastream Public Media ⁠0%

9/22/2022, 3:53:23 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 128 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (21,885 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

WCLV Program Guide 7-22-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Wed 7/22/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-21-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Tues 7/21/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-20-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Mon 7/20/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-19-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Sun 7/19/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-18-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Sat 7/18/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-17-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Fri 7/17/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-16-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Thu 7/16/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-15-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Wed 7/15/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-14-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Tues 7/14/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-12-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Sun 7/12/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-11-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Sat 7/11/26. 
WCLV Program Guide 7-10-2026 
WCLV's Scheduled Playlist for Fri 7/10/26. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 1.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 3.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 3.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 1.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 9.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 2.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 2.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 5.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 4.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ideastream Public Media: 7.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

128 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers97%attributed speech4writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageIdeastream Public Media • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWCLV • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

WCLV

0%flagged-word coverage
120 attributed words97% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.