Topic summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Northeast Ohio results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 1,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,471 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,630 of 16,562 topics). This Northeast Ohio is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Northeast Ohio

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
6.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.0%23.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos