Author summary
96% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Hurst results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 8,100 hits . Analysis detected 37,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,240 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,728 of 8,782 authors). This Evan Hurst is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Evan Hurst
Author details
Total words: 20,240
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 40.0% 40.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 21.9% 21.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 21.9%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Author 20.9%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst