Author summary
93% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doktor Zoom results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 4,314 hits . Analysis detected 20,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,398 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,610 of 8,782 authors). This Doktor Zoom is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Doktor Zoom
Author details
Total words: 14,398
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.0% 30.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst