Wonkette93%

Trump Blanches At Blanche Confirmation Impasse, Will Take His Blanche And Go Home 65%

By Doktor Zoom93%

7/31/2026, 7:15:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.2% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 1,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 875 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.1% and a BS Rank of 65% (9,745 of 27,377 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the article peer group.

Donald Trump on Thursday said that since Republicans in the Senate don’t have enough votes to confirm his personal lawyer Todd Blanche as attorney general, he may withdraw the nomination and submit it after the midterms, leaving Blanche in place as (acting) AG until Trump gets his way. 
Two lame-duck Republican senators, John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, said they can’t support Blanche’s confirmation unless Trump accepts limits on the sweetheart tax immunity deal Blanche announced in May as part of Trump’s fictional “settlement” of his bogus lawsuit against himself. 
Cornyn told reporters Wednesday that Trump refused to put in writing a commitment to really kill a $1.776 billion slush fund for January 6 criminals and other “victims” of “weaponization,” and to clarify the details of the tax immunity deal. 
Cornyn said that he wants written agreement that the immunity would only apply to current IRS audits of Trump, his family, and his billion or so front companies, and wouldn’t prevent the IRS from looking at future tax criming by Great Leader. 
In a pissy little post to his personal Twitter knockoff Thursday, Trump whined that  Todd Blanche is a STAR” and that Cornyn and Tillis are just big meanies who are retaliating against Trump for throwing them into the cornfield not endorsing them for reelection. 
Trump wrote that he had  no objection to temporarily withdrawing Todd’s name, if they do not do the right thing, and putting him back after Cornyn and Tillis are out of office,” which assumes that Republicans will still hold the Senate after the midterm elections. 
We’ll just note here that a new Fox News poll shows former North Carolina Gov. 
Roy Cooper (D) nine points ahead of Republican Michael Whatley in the race to fill Tillis’s seat. 
And in Texas, Democrat James Talarico has a five-point polling lead over corrupt creep Ken Paxton in the election for Cornyn’s spot. 
Wouldn’t electing both  and flipping at least two other seats  be the funniest way to make Trump mad? 
Wonkette is just mischievous sometimes. 
If you can, please become a paid subscriber! 
You can also use the button below to donate an amount of your choice at Paypal, or we have a Patreon too. 
Cornyn responded to Trump’s online tantrum with a Twitter message saying that Trump would be  mistaken if he believes concerns about the provisions in his tax lawsuit settlement are limited to me and Senator Tillis,” completely ignoring the objective fact that Blanche is a STAR and you’ll all be sorry you got in his way. 
That point was echoed Thursday by Sen. 
Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who told reporters she was “hopeful” that discussions with the Justice Department might result in a written deal to curb the bullshit “settlement” of Trump’s grifty lawsuit. 
She said that when she met with Blanche, she’d told him,  I have real concerns about this. 
What can you do to narrow the scope of the IRS settlement? 
How can you give us assurance that this anti-representation fund is truly dead?” 
Murkowski didn’t say how Blanche replied, but we suspect it may have involved grunting. 
With typical circumlocution, the New York Times tut-tutted (gift link) that this is all most unseemly and without precedent, my word: 
That the fate of an attorney general would be jeopardized by the administration’s apparent determination to keep in place a tax deal offering a sitting president enormous financial advantages illustrated a defining characteristic of Mr. 
Trump’s second term: a president’s personal interest, along with public interest, is now a factor in governing. 
Yes, that is somehow still surprising. 
Just to underline how committed he is to keeping his tax deal and throwing $1.8 billion to his pardoned rioter brownshirts, Trump began Friday morning by insisting on his Lie Social site that the slush fund is definitely still a thing (link to Joe.My.God) and he will reward the “great American Patriots who were hunted down like dogs and whose lives were unfairly and illegally destroyed by the Crooked Joe Biden Administration,” et cetera, ad infinitum. 
Cornyn, who in his final months of power seems to at least enjoy stirring the proverbial shit, was a little skeptical of Trump’s brilliant plan to simply bring Blanche back after the midterms. 
Trump, Cornyn said,  has a unique way of negotiating,” he said, and we will assume he pantomimed the universal hand gesture for “jerking off.” 
Cornyn continued, “He may think that, you know, he’s got us where he wants us, but the fact is, there’s no guarantee who the senators are going to be to replace Senator Tillis and myself, and he may have a weaker hand next year than he does now.” 
He did not, however, follow that by adding “You know what? 
Fuck him. 
Y’all should vote for that Talarico fella, he’s way better than that asshole Paxton.” 
All Wonkette posts are public! 
Share this one and impress your friends with your smarts! 
Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. 
If you can, please become a paid subscriber, or if you’d like to make a one-time (or recurring) donation, you can click this here button. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.9%Doktor Zoom: 2.7%Wonkette: 5.5%Confirmation Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.5%Wonkette: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Doktor Zoom: 1.8%Wonkette: 2.1%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.9%Wonkette: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Doktor Zoom: 2.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias5.3%This article: 5.5%Doktor Zoom: 10.2%Wonkette: 4.0%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 1.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.5%Doktor Zoom: 1.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 1.7%Wonkette: 0.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Doktor Zoom: 2.1%Wonkette: 1.5%Pessimism Bias10.3%This article: 42.5%Doktor Zoom: 18.3%Wonkette: 16.0%Negativity Bias42.5%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 2.0%Wonkette: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 2.6%Wonkette: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Doktor Zoom: 1.0%Wonkette: 1.4%In-Group Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 3.5%Wonkette: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 1.3%Wonkette: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Doktor Zoom: 0.7%Wonkette: 0.9%Recency Bias1.7%This article: 0.7%Doktor Zoom: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.5%Wonkette: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 18.5%Doktor Zoom: 9.3%Wonkette: 11.9%Ad Hominem18.5%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 1.5%Wonkette: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 2.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.3%Doktor Zoom: 1.0%Wonkette: 1.1%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 1.8%Wonkette: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Doktor Zoom: 4.5%Wonkette: 8.0%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.7%Wonkette: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.6%Doktor Zoom: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.4%Bandwagon1.6%This article: 14.5%Doktor Zoom: 6.5%Wonkette: 7.2%Appeal to Emotion14.5%This article: 9.3%Doktor Zoom: 1.4%Wonkette: 0.7%Begging the Question9.3%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 1.7%Wonkette: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.9%Wonkette: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.6%Doktor Zoom: 0.8%Wonkette: 2.1%Anecdotal1.6%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.1%Wonkette: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.7%Doktor Zoom: 1.2%Wonkette: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.7%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Doktor Zoom: 1.3%Wonkette: 2.0%Unattributed Quote2.1%This article: 6.4%Doktor Zoom: 2.2%Wonkette: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection6.4%This article: 44.2%Doktor Zoom: 30.0%Wonkette: 30.7%Biased Writer Voice44.2%This article: 1.6%Doktor Zoom: 3.8%Wonkette: 2.2%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 6.3%Doktor Zoom: 9.5%Wonkette: 10.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Doktor Zoom: 0.2%Wonkette: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Doktor Zoom: 5.0%Wonkette: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.9%

875 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers39%attributed speech535writer words
Selected voice

John Cornyn

63%flagged-word coverage
244 attributed words72% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.0 ptsWriter: 57.2%John Cornyn: 33.2%33.2%Quote-first Misdirection+23.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Cornyn: 23.0%23.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.6 ptsWriter: 14.6%John Cornyn: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B+9.4 ptsWriter: 4.1%John Cornyn: 13.5%13.5%Indoctrination-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%John Cornyn: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.