Author summary
92%4 analyzed articles/videos4,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Legum results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 5,518 hits. Analysis detected 22,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,247 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,126 of 8,783 authors). This Gary Legum is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Gary Legum
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
65%Gary Legum (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,247
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.0%34.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate