Publication summary
40% 10 analyzed articles/videos 14,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prism results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 3,710 hits . Analysis detected 34,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,222 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (405 of 545 publications). This Prism is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 63,222
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles63.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst