Author summary
72%1 analyzed article/video953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maurizio Guerrero results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 3,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,347 of 8,361 authors). This Maurizio Guerrero is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Maurizio Guerrero
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
72%Maurizio Guerrero (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,812
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos