Author summary
17%1 analyzed article/video2,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Derek R. Trumbo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (7,760 of 8,394 authors). This Derek R. Trumbo is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group.
Derek R. Trumbo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
8%Derek R. Trumbo (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,672
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751007.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos