Author summary
â 25% 1 analyzed article/video 2,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Herring results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 561 hits . Analysis detected 3,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 16% (7,094 of 8,369 authors). This Rachel Herring is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Rachel Herring
Author details
Total words: 8,608
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst