Author summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hassan Abo Qamar results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 566 hits . Analysis detected 3,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,509 of 6,228 authors). This Hassan Abo Qamar is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Hassan Abo Qamar
Author details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.5% 12.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.6%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst