Publication summary
8% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Monitor results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 1,590 hits . Analysis detected 15,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,931 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (353 of 379 publications). This Austin Monitor is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 28,931
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score11 analyzed articles28.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst