Author summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miles Wall results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Optimism Bias , and Status Quo Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 254 hits . Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,910 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,453 of 6,263 authors). This Miles Wall is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Miles Wall
Author details
Total words: 2,910
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst