Author summary
4%1 analyzed article/video714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Bernier results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,813 of 6,189 authors). This Nathan Bernier is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Nathan Bernier
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Nathan Bernier (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510022.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos