Author summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lina Fisher results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 3,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,890 of 6,628 authors). This Lina Fisher is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Lina Fisher
Author details
Total words: 7,224
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst