Author summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos1,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lina Fisher results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 3,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,890 of 6,628 authors). This Lina Fisher is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Lina Fisher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
12%Lina Fisher (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,224
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos