Author summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Weber results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 159 hits . Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,306 of 6,316 authors). This Andrew Weber is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Andrew Weber
Author details
Total words: 1,515
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Straw Man: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst