Author summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jo Clifton results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 303 hits . Analysis detected 2,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,605 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,941 of 6,235 authors). This Jo Clifton is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Jo Clifton
Author details
Total words: 3,605
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst