Keyword summary
44% 10 analyzed articles/videos 1,969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victor Wembanyama results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 5,923 hits . Analysis detected 35,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,008 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (28,406 of 34,642 keywords). This Victor Wembanyama is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Victor Wembanyama
Keyword details
Total words: 41,008
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score10 analyzed articles41K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst