The Guardian81%
Victor Wembanyama’s half-court buzzer beater showcased a master in complete control 30%
By Owen Lewis0%
5/25/2026, 12:49:38 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 70.4% saturation with 665 hits. Analysis detected 2,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 945 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,400 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the article peer group.
Victor Wembanyama called for the ball.
His San Antonio Spurs were up by nine at the tail end of the second quarter, but had led by as many as 16 in the first half.
Down 2-1 in the Western Conference Finals to the Oklahoma City Thunder, building the lead in the final seconds of the half felt urgent – in the previous game, the Spurs had exploded into a 15-0 lead, only to lose heavily.
In Game 4 on Sunday night, the klaxon was closing in, and so might the Thunder.
Wembanyama got in a couple dribbles, but only had time to reach half-court before the clock forced him to shoot.
He hoisted the ball into the air from 43ft; the buzzer sounded.
The ball slammed cleanly into the basket.
Buoyed up by that shot and the Thunder clanking almost all their three-point attempts off the rim as if in solidarity with one another, the Spurs completed a 21-point annihilation to tie the series.
The buzzer-beater brought to mind the long three Wembanyama hit in Game 1, which forced a second overtime when the Spurs were struggling for offense and on the brink of defeat.
(Another point to consider: Three-point shooting is not even the Frenchman’s most potent skill.)
That shot was from a mere 32ft, but was executed under more pressure, when other, safer options were available.
If you’re not a fan of shots behind the arc, maybe the moment on Sunday when Wembanyama missed a tip-in, then corrected it with a backwards tap over his head was what made your heart sing.
Or the most spiteful of his blocks.
Or one of the many times when an opposing player streaked to the basket for a layup, spied Wembanyama in the paint, and kept right on dribbling by.
He is beginning to stack magical moments atop each other.
Through four games of this postseason matchup, it seems clear that the Thunder are the better and deeper team.
San Antonio’s starters have narrowly outplayed Oklahoma City’s, but the Thunder’s bench has proven stronger by about five times that margin.
The depths of Wembanyama’s talents have been required just to keep this series competitive.
In Game 1, Wemby produced a 41-24 double-double that had many a podcaster wondering if the Thunder – the defending champions, best-record-in-the-league Thunder! – could do anything to stop him.
Thunder’s hulking German center Isaiah Hartenstein has offered the rejoinder, wrapping his 7ft 4in opponent in a buffet of bear hugs that evade referees’ whistles, minimizing the Frenchman’s ability to get into the paint and slam home dunks or snare rebounds.
Wembanyama had a milder performance in Game 2.
In Game 3, his voice in the paint – only four boards! – felt quiet to the point of silence, given that he’s capable of making more noise there than anybody who’s ever lived.
At that point, the Spurs’ astonishing Game 1 triumph felt like a pyrrhic victory.
Their starters played so many minutes.
The Thunder felt like they had an endless reserve of second-stringers capable of leaping off the pine and delivering a sweatless 18 points, and with several of them in Game 3 they brutalized San Antonio’s reserves while letting the stars rest.
How that problem wouldn’t compound over the rest of the series felt hard to imagine.
But Wembanyama put up 33 of the Spurs’ 103 points in Game 4, supplementing it with his usual defensive impact, and what may be even more encouraging is that he only played 31 minutes.
With the Spurs enjoying a healthy lead late in the fourth quarter, he got a head start on his recovery on a stationary bike in the tunnel.
The Spurs have a path to victory here, but it remains precarious: Get herculean performances from Wembanyama, and just enough from everybody else.
The Spurs’ crucial offensive creators in De’Aaron Fox and Dylan Harper are compromised, Devin Vassell and Stephon Castle are excellent on both ends of the floor but don’t take over games (not to mention Castle’s copious turnovers this series).
Wembanyama knows the deal.
It was there in that ridiculous 32-footer to rescue Game 1.
He knew his teammates’ ability to generate offense was dying a fast death.
As absurd as it sounds, he took that long three-pointer with 19 seconds left on the shot clock out of necessity.
More than anything, you can see how vital Wembanyama is to his team when he has to rest and his backup, Luke Kornet, comes in.
Kornet is a perfectly good player; he could start on the Lakers.
But in this series, at this standard, he borders on unusable.
He’s incinerated as soon as he steps on to the court.
It raises the question of whether the Spurs could somehow play Wembanyama for all 48 minutes, at a limited intensity.
Kornet’s stat line from his 13 minutes of playing time on Sunday sparkles: six points on three-of-four shooting, seven rebounds, two blocks.
The Thunder still outscored the Spurs by nine in that time.
The Spurs won Wembanyama’s minutes by twenty-nine.
The Spurs are deep enough in this series to believe that Wembanyama’s sorcery will be enough to win it.
You feel bad for those who have staked out anti-Wembanyama campsites already.
The Spurs are young and dealing with enough injuries – and the Thunder are a special enough team – that Wembanyama is the underdog.
His triumphs can still feel unlikely, and are worth cherishing for as long as that’s true.
One day he and the Spurs will be so good that we’ll laugh at the memory, or maybe mourn it.
Speakers
1speaker0.6%attributed speech939writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
0%flagged-word coverageVictor Wembanyama
6 attributed words100% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.