Keyword summary
71% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oklahoma City Thunder results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,126 hits . Analysis detected 11,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,502 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (23,844 of 34,053 keywords). This Oklahoma City Thunder is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Oklahoma City Thunder
Keyword details
Total words: 11,502
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst