Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Owen Lewis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 950 hits . Analysis detected 4,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,751 of 6,277 authors). This Owen Lewis is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Owen Lewis
Author details
Total words: 3,780
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.1% 25.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.4% 16.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst