Keyword summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Midterm Elections results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 6,562 hits . Analysis detected 39,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,879 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,968 of 37,536 keywords). This US Midterm Elections is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. US Midterm Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 44,879
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles44.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst