Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Steven Greenhouse results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 50.4% saturation with 2,083 hits . Analysis detected 8,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Steven Greenhouse is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Steven Greenhouse
Author details
Total words: 4,132
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 50.4% 50.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.0% 21.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 18.6% 18.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.1% 28.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.3% 18.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 50.4%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 28.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 18.6%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst